|
Proposal Number : IST-2001-32185 Acronym : C@PUCINE
Action line : IST-2001-5.1.5 Type of action : Accompanying Measure
Title : C@pucine : Citizen to Administration accompanying measure and thematic network for a secure and trustworthy smart card system
|
Proposers
|
Role
|
Country
|
Cost
|
%
|
Funding
|
%
|
|
AUSY FRANCE
DCO
|
-
|
France
|
70,000
|
6.95
|
70,000
|
6.95
|
|
COMUNE DI CEFALÙ
COMUNE DI CEFALÙ
|
-
|
Italy
|
30,000
|
2.98
|
30,000
|
2.98
|
|
CONSEIL GÉNÉRAL DES CÔTES D'ARMOR
CONSEIL GÉNÉRAL DES CÔTES D'ARMOR MISSION INTERNATIONALE
|
-
|
France
|
30,000
|
2.98
|
30,000
|
2.98
|
|
FREE HANSEATIC CITY OF BREMEN SENATOR FUER FINANZEN
36 (TUI)
|
-
|
Germany
|
50,000
|
4.96
|
50,000
|
4.96
|
|
HUMAN FACTORS SOLUTIONS ANS
HUMAN FACTORS SOLUTIONS ANS
|
-
|
Norway
|
40,000
|
3.97
|
40,000
|
3.97
|
|
NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL
IT SERVICES
|
-
|
United Kingdom
|
115,000
|
11.41
|
115,000
|
11.41
|
|
SEM ISSY MEDIA
SEM ISSY MEDIA
|
-
|
France
|
40,000
|
3.97
|
40,000
|
3.97
|
|
SETESI SERVIZI TELEMATICI SICILIANI S.P.A.
SETESI SERVIZI TELEMATICI SICILIANI S.P.A.
|
-
|
Italy
|
40,000
|
3.97
|
40,000
|
3.97
|
|
UNION NATIONALE DES ASSOCIATIONS FAMILIALES
MISSION NOUVELLES TECHNOLOGIES ET POLITIQUES FAMILIALES - DREAP
|
CO
|
France
|
234,000
|
23.23
|
234,000
|
23.23
|
|
CONFEDERATION DES ORGANISATIONS FAMILIALES DE L' U.E.
COFACE
|
CR
|
Belgium
|
115,500
|
11.46
|
115,500
|
11.46
|
|
SMART INFORMATION SYSTEM GLOBAL ENGINEERING AND MARKETING
SISGEM
|
CR
|
France
|
243,000
|
24.12
|
243,000
|
24.12
|
|
|
|
1,007,500
|
100
|
1,007,500
|
100
|
Abstract : The C@pucine (Citizen Smart Card) project presented in this proposal is the result of a social initiative aiming to mobilise European citizens, associations, companies and public organisations to create, promote and experiment a Citizen smart Card system which will benefit all European citizens and families. During this project, a complete study will be made on the requirements and needs of European citizens and families in terms of social, administrative and business applications. This work will lead to the definition of the system and of technical architectures to develop the initiative at European level. This will be achieved through the contributions provided by a network of European family associations, NGO' s and cities of the digital city network.
This proposal failed on one of the threshold
|
Criteria
|
Criteria description
|
Score
|
Score comments
|
|
1
|
Scientific/technological quality and innovation
|
2
|
The objectives of the project are vague, lacking detail. Methodologies are not defined, which is important in this type of project, and the roles of four of the participants are not clearly defined.
|
|
2
|
Community added value and contribution of EC policies
|
3
|
The impact of this project could be very high, contributing significantly to adding value to the European Community, but there is a real risk that the desired results will not be achieved due to the weak methodology and the lack of detail about the way in which the work is to be carried out.
|
|
3
|
Contribution to Community social objectives
|
3
|
The project will have only an indirect impact on Community social objectives; even if it succeeds well. Eventually, in the longer term, it will facilitate the movement of employees between European states.
|
|
4
|
Economic development and S&T prospects
|
3
|
If families throughout Europe assimilate and use the technologies, the project will have an impact on the European marketplace. The proposal did not make clear how the consortium expects to achieve its desired results, and the evaluators had doubts about the ability of the project to deliver.
|
|
5
|
Resources, partnership and management
|
2
|
Some resources have been included in this proposal inappropriately. Much of the work planned for determining the ‘state of the art’ in this field has already been done, and the results are known from other EU project reports. This could result in an overestimated budget by some 30-40 %.
|
|
10
|
Overall Score
|
NV
|
|
|
Evaluation CEE